• Soap Opera

    This evening I opened up my Inbox and found this delightful email from my friend KumKum. Unfortunately she did not identify the author but I would like to share this incident with some bath time memories of my own : 

    • Water that smelt metallic thanks to being stored in huge drums
    • Bathrooom  doors that  barely shut
    • 2 minute baths before the tap ran into a trickle
    • Toilet paper as rough as sandpaper
    • Toilet bowls filled with milky white phenyl
    • Pulling the toilet chain of an overhead water tank


    The Times, They Are A’Changin!

    My daughter Puja and I were at the Command CSD Canteen, and I was lamenting the non availability of `Imperial Leather’, my preferred bathing soap.
    “You still use SOAP?” she cried incredulously, making the word `soap’ sound like a four letter word (I know it is, but you know what I mean). “Pa, who uses SOAP (there again, the same sound) these days?”
    I glanced around the aisle, ran my eye over the three whole shelf rows choc-a-bloc full of the offending item, and was just about to answer “Well, just about everybody”, when she yanked my arm and dragged me to another counter.
    “Here!” she said, grabbing a fancy looking tube from another counter, “use this!”
    The label on the collapsible tube said `Shower Gel’, and I wondered how on earth it could replace a healthy bar of soap which one could (and did) vigorously rub all over one’s torso. At the risk of sounding an ignoramus, I asked her how one used the stuff. She rolled her eyes heavenwards, and gave me the look one normally reserves for mentally challenged six year olds, and sighed “With a loofa, pa!” 
    The shower gel, she explained, was not for the face – for that she picked up another smaller tube called a `face wash’. It was my turn to roll my eyes skywards.
    As kids, all we had at home were two basic soaps – a hefty red `Lifebuoy’ bar for bathing, and an even bigger yellow one for washing clothes. The richer kids used Lux, the `soap of the film stars’, which accounted for the fact that they always smelt (or so we thought) a bit like pansies. The Lifebuoy, on the other hand, smelt exactly like what it was billed as – a germicidal. I finally gave up on it only when I saw it being used as a hand wash in the Zoology lab in College, and all the girls (the ones that mattered anyway) crinkling up their noses in disgust at its offensive presence in their lives.
    We Army guys, our preferred brands of toiletries (disparagingly referred to as `saaboon-tel’) is normally limited to whatever is available in the CSD Canteen! After Lifebouy, I tried all sorts, including the Karen Lunal inspired Liril. Check out the ad – the sight of the bikini clad Karen cavorting under a waterfall sold me quite a few cakes of Liril in the 80’s. Had to give it up hastily when a pretty young thing asked me why I always reeked so strongly of nimbu pani!
    Call me archaic, but I still shave with an old fashioned double-edged razor blade, till recently used a cup soap – migrated to shaving cream after my brother complained that my bathroom smelt like a barber shop, and regularly use talcum powder. Yes, TALCUM POWDER – kar lo jo karna hai!
    My son, on the other hand, alternates between shaving gels and foams, uses a Gillette Fusion razor, and has a set of colognes, after shaves, perfumes and deodorants that would be the envy of Priyanka Chopra! To be fair, he is way way too conservative when compared to my son in law, who takes the cake, icing et al. Being metro sexual is one thing, but Sukh is just a product or two short of having his own show in Vegas!
    Shampoo entered my life just a couple of years ago – earlier it was plain Shikakai soap. The kids have separate shampoos, conditioners and hair products even your hair didn’t know existed! Sukh has now come upon an `All-in-one’ – shampoo, conditioner, face wash and shower gel – which he can use from head to toe. Of course, you can watch the entire season of `Homeland’ by the time he emerges from the shower!
    My nephew Rohit was much the same. After a shower, he’d sprinkle an entire can of talcum powder over his expansive frame, and would then stomp all over the house leaving his trademark Size-11 footprints in stark white in every room. We called his showers `maha mast abhishekams’, and I once seriously suggested he use milk instead of water!
    We are a nation of washers, not wipers – which is our biggest bane during our trips abroad. Here too, times have changed. The brass `lota’ gave way to the `mugga’ once we entered the age of plastic, and then of course the hygiene faucet (inexplicably called the `muslim shower’ in some quarters) caused a paradigm shift in our morning rituals. What a cataclysmic change that was!
    And post the act, like Macbeth, when we need to wash the `guilt’ off our hands, we now have an obscene range of liquid hand washes to choose from – of all fragrances, colours and viscosities. Not for me, however, the ghastly `hand sanitisers’ that the modern lass carries in her handbag (along with pepper spray and a .22 pistol, if she happens to be in Delhi). I tried one once, and found I needed to wash my hands immediately after, since the sanitiser left my hands feeling gooey (`chip-chip’ if you know what I mean)!
    The ubiquitous yellow `shining cloth’ we used to brasso our stars and shine our ammunition boots with is now passé. We have separate micro fiber cleaning cloths for every surface – laptop screens, glassware, and even for spectacle lenses! But believe me, if you really want a sparkling shine on any surface, nothing, just nothing beats an old baniyan!
    As a kid, I had to hide my Brylcreem from a dad who insisted on `khopre-ka-tel’. Now, I guess I’ll have to hide a bar of soap from my daughter in favour of a tube of shower gel! 
    For years, it was our parents who dictated our choices. Now it is our children. The times, sure, they are a changin’!
      

    Thank you unknown author for sharing this delightful anecdote………..

  • Yeda ban ke peda

    This very strange sounding title in Bambaiya – the bastardized Hindi that is the official language of my city that is neither Hindi nor Marathi which totally captures the spirit of this city – cheeky and irreverent – loses its flavour when translated into plain English. However, in simple English it means a Smart Fool. 

    The smart fool is essentially the person who acts the bumbling idiot, who manages to get his way by his universally appealing “guileless” charm.

    The heated arguments, TV debates and media hype  about “pardoning” Sanjay Dutt  that have been raging this past week have firmed my belief that it is truly the idiot or lovable fool who gets away with murder. While forgiveness and justice tempered with mercy are laudable, surely there should also be some correlation between action and punishment?

    Honestly, the way people are clamouring for Sanjay to be pardoned makes me question the values and beliefs I was brought up with. My old beliefs and values no longer hold good in today’s world where more and more horrendous crimes are being pardoned or forgiven with the excuse that the perpetrator was “unaware” of what he was doing.

    The new mantras for new age children should no longer be as you sow so you reap 
    but 

    • Ask and you shall be forgiven. 
    • Fools always win
    • Cheaters always prosper
    • Crime always pays
    • Mothers know nothing at all

    Societies have never been static having been influenced by interacting cultures and different ideals. But it is strange how time honoured codes of behaviour like honesty, integrity, truth and justice have changed to accommodate declining mores and values. Is this the natural outcome of a more advanced technological society constantly bombarded by techno bytes?

    While I do not want to go back to the riverside to wash my clothes or forage in the jungle for firewood to cook my meal, I definitely miss the good old days when a man was known by the company he kept and honest day’s work ensured a good night’s sleep!

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Crime and Punishment

    Ever since Sanjay Dutt has been sentenced to jail for a 5 year tern our TV anchors have been hosting debates on whether he should be pardoned or not.

    Many people feel that Sanjay Dutt should be pardoned because

    • The case is 20 years old and he has already “suffered” the fear of being arrested any time
    • During the last 20 years he has had to ask for Court permission any time he wanted to travel abroad
    • He has already spent 2 years in jail
    • He is not convicted of being a terrorist – only of holding weapons 
    • He had not intended to misuse the weapons
    • He has since his jail term been an exemplary citizen
    • He was a misguided youth who didn’t know the antecedents or intention of the people he was keeping company with
    • His parents have been good citizens and known social workers
    • He has spread the message of Gandhi through his film “Munnabhai
    • He is married with three young children and this will upset his family

    Many people feel Sanjay Dutt shouldn’t be pardoned because:

    • A 33 year old is no Spring Chick and should be fully aware of the consequences of his action
    • No one keeps AK 47s in his house just for fun. Especially in a country which requires a gun licence and bearing fire arms is a cognizable offence
    • Sanjay Dutt is a celebrity but he is still accused of an offence and should be treated like any other ordinary citizen

    Crime & Punishment are concepts that have many areas of grey. Offences in the past like drinking have now become legal. Similarly with changing social mores child marriage has become illegal while widow marriage is allowed. In our society abortions are legal while in others they are not. So morality, crime and punishment are entirely societal and subjective.

    Who then is liable to punishment and who should go off scot free?
    If a man is responsible for his actions and is willing to take the credit for his success, shouldn’t he also be able to take the punishment for his wrong doing?
    If an 18 year old is fit enough to vote and get married is a 30 year old too young to know the error of his ways?

    Personally speaking it was wrong of Sanjay Dutt to keep guns in his house. He was running around with the wrong crowd. He was a spoilt brat.

    He may have become a successful film star but that does not exonerate him from his crime and if the court has deemed it fit that he got to jail he should.

    Consider the following Jailable offences in India :

    • The simple act of pulling the chain of a running train can land you in jail for 3 months 
    • Exploiting tribals from the Andamans can land you in jail  for upto 7 years
    • A Facebook “like” can land you in jail
    • Disturbing a gathering engaged in religious worship can get you into jail for a year
    • Spreading false rumours with the intention to disturb peace can get you into jail for upto 3 years
    These are just some of the offences that are recognised as punishable. If possessing an illegal firearm is a punishable offence, why should Sanjay Dutt not get justice?

    Enhanced by Zemanta
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started